Misinformation

The 9/11/01 attack was and is a psychological operation: It was designed to deceive people by exploiting their subconscious conditioning and desires, such as the extreme reluctance to consider seriously the possibility that the "leaders of the free world" are in fact the perpetrators of 9/11/01 and similar false-flag terror operations. The true identities of the perpetrators of the attack are further hidden by disinformation campaigns which reinforce the idea that only foolish conspiracy theorists question the official story. The most effective such campaigns are waged mostly by unwitting participants, victims of cleverly marketed misinformation.

• Sites exposing misinformation
• Pages exposing misinformation

Sites Exposing Misinformation

site and description	format	focus
QuestionsQuestions.net This site, currently frozen, has a collection of articles in its "information warfare" section providing the most detailed and objective debunking of dubious attack theories.	collection of illustrated articles
911Review REVIEWED This site deconstructs the much-promoted website 911review.org, suggesting that its sloppy analysis and promotion of discredited and discrediting ideas is either the result of incompetence or an agenda to sabotage the 9/11 truth movement.	marked-up copy of reviewed site
Debunking the Debunkers This site covers many topics, and emphasizes analysis of arguments advanced by "debunkers".	illustrated articles

Pages Exposing Misinformation

URL and description	format
www.visibility911.com/reports-cointelpro01.php COINTELPRO special This page summarizes a series of 2007 interviews by Michael Woolsey with various researchers on the subject of COINTELPRO and disinformation, including Jim Hoffman, John Albanese, and William Pepper.	illustrated article
www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/767orwhatzit.html The WTC Impacts: 767s or 'Whatzits'? This article deconstructs the idea, promoted by Webfairy, Scott Longhrey, and Gerard Holmgren, that one or both of the Twin Tower collisions were faked and did not involve actual 767s.	illustrated article
www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/767orwhatzit2.html The 'no planers' respond This second article in the series by Eric Salter examines responses by Webfairy and Scott Longhrey to the first article.	illustrated article
www.oilempire.us/bogus.html Disinformation masquerading as 9/11 Truth exposure This essay summarizes the disinformation memes used to pollute the discourse about the attack. Much of the content of this once lengthy page has been split off into other pages, such as the hoaxes page, leaving this page to focus on the history of the 'no-planes' theories.	essay
www.oilempire.us/inplanesite.html In Plane Site: a bad joke 'hidden in plain sight' This essay provides a devastating critique of the video In Plane Site.	illustrated essay
www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html The Pentagon attack: the 'no plane' theories discredit 9/11 skepticism and distract from proven evidence of complicity This in-depth essay provides a thorough rundown on the Pentagon 'no-plane' theories and how they've been used as a distraction.	illustrated essay
www.911review.com/infowars.html Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception This page examines the way in which misinformation is used to discredit challenges to the official account of 0/11/01. It is the introductory page to the large information warfare section of 911Review.com, which flags numerous errors in the literature of '9/11 skeptics.'	overview page
911review.com/reviews/911eyewitness/index.html Rick Siegel's 9/11 Eyewitness: Sensationalism and Pseudo-Science This review of the video 9/11 Eyesitness describes the DVD, which combines footage of videographer Rick Siegel talking, Siegel's footage of the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 with overlays, and illustrated narration packaged as science lessons. As the review shows, the DVD's most prominent claims are anything but scientific.	illustrated essay
flight77.info/old.htm Flight77.info The running commentary of the creator of Flight77.info, a website created to document the legal process to obtain government-held video recordings related to Flight 77, has many interesting reflections on the psychology behind the no-Boeing theories.	weblog
arabesque911.blogspot.com/2007/08/kennebunkport-warning-hoax-controversy.html The Kennebunkport Warning: Hoax? This article exposes an apparent hoax circulated weeks before the sixth anniversary of the attack, perhaps with the intent of driving a wedge between peace activists and 9/11 truth activists.

back to Web Resources