ScienceDaily Logo
Text Size >  A  A  A  
Print this page
Email to friend

World Trade Center Dust Analysis Offers Good News For New Yorkers

The rubble has been cleared from the World Trade Center site, but questions still loom about the long-term health effects on people who survived the terrorist attacks. A new study of dust samples taken from around Manhattan in the days following Sept. 11, 2001, could offer some much-needed good news.

Related News Stories

World Trade Center Clean-Up Workers Report Acute Respiratory Problems (August 26, 2002) -- Many workers who cleared debris from the site of the World Trade Center attack of September 11 reported acute respiratory symptoms, according to a health assessment conducted by the Johns Hopkins ... full story

9-11 Rescue Crews Could Have Used Waterjet Technology To Cut Through Rubble And Fight Fire (September 3, 2002) -- In the aftermath of last year's terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, researchers at the University of Missouri-Rolla are developing a waterjet system to more effectively cut through rubble ... full story

Scientists Find Geochemical Fingerprint Of World Trade Center Collapse (January 21, 2003) -- Dust and debris deposits associated with the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the World Trade Center have left a distinct fingerprint on the sedimentary record in New York Harbor, scientists ... full story

New Study Of Ground Zero Air Shows Indoor Spaces Can Be Cleaned; Diesel Pollution Remains A Threat (September 26, 2002) -- A new UC Davis study shows that if they are properly cleaned, apartments and offices near the site of the collapsed World Trade Center towers are safe for living and working. The study also found ... full story

Related sections:

A team of researchers tested debris from the collapsed towers for toxic organic chemicals and found that the potential risk of exposure from inhaling such compounds was lower than expected. The findings are scheduled to appear in the Feb. 1 print edition of Environmental Science & Technology, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Chemical Society, the world's largest scientific society. The article was initially published Dec. 18 on the journal's Web site.

The scientists were looking specifically for persistent organic pollutants — highly stable compounds that pose a special problem because they endure in the environment and can be toxic to humans and wildlife. They found no evidence of high levels of two particular POPs: pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls, which were used in hundreds of industrial and commercial applications until their production was banned in 1977.

The team did, however, estimate that the dust covering lower Manhattan contained between 100-1000 tons of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons — a group of compounds containing some that are classified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as probable human carcinogens. But, while the amount of PAHs was high, the dust particles to which the chemicals stuck were large enough to stay out of a person's lungs, according to Paul Lioy, Ph.D., associate director of the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute in Piscataway, N.J., and an author of the paper.

"The fact that the particles were primarily above 10 micrometers in diameter would mean that the deposition was in the upper airways of the respiratory system and more readily cleared than fine particles, which would deposit deeper in the lung," Lioy says. "That means, in terms of potential lifetime exposures, we're probably going to be very lucky in that these may not be exposures of significant health risk."

Immediately after the attacks, the majority of people focused their attention on asbestos, Lioy says. But he and his colleagues felt the only way to understand the situation was to determine everything people could possibly have been exposed to. "In contrast to what we normally do every day in environmental sciences, this was a catastrophic event," Lioy says. "We had no clue what was in there and what size ranges, so our goal was to do a full characterization of the entire aerosol."

Lioy and others were invited to Ground Zero to help assess the impact on public health after the attacks. They took samples from 13 locations around the World Trade Center site from Sept. 12-17. In an earlier paper, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, the group performed a more general analysis on the samples and reported that the dust had a high level of glass fibers and a high pH. "Most of the acute responses were probably due to the very long fibers which we reported in our first paper and the high pH of the cement dust that was released in the first few days," Lioy says.

Phase II of the experiment, which is reported in the current paper, was led by John Offenberg, Ph.D., of Rutgers University. The team focused mainly on the persistent organic pollutants and their potential for long-term health risks. They also looked to see if there was some uniformity in the way the PAHs were spread around Manhattan.

Three of the samples constituted a north-south transect down Church Street, along the east side of the epicenter. The concentrations of PAHs in these samples increased toward the south, which is in keeping with the wind direction immediately after the disaster: The wind blew to the east/northeast during the first 12-18 hours, carrying debris, dust and smoke to the East River and beyond. Then the winds shifted to the south, carrying the dust over Battery Park and south to New Jersey.

The research group plans to use this information along with samples taken indoors to study potential health risks regarding the cleaning of people's houses and apartments. "Although it's a big number — 100-1000 tons of PAHs — it's not the only health concern," Offenberg says. "Simply having three inches of concrete dust in one's living room is a very unique experience, in terms of cleaning up. You don't just get out your vacuum cleaner and run it."

This story has been adapted from a news release issued by American Chemical Society.

Can't find it? Try searching ScienceDaily or the entire web with:
 Search Our Archives
relevance date
 New Job Postings


———————   Copyright 1995-2004 ScienceDaily LLC   |   Contact:   ———————