The Psychology Of Patriotic Denial
By Tova Gabrielle
Thursday, October 07, 2004
“When a problem seems too huge to fix, you can’t change it until you change your beliefs.”- the author
Why No One Was Asking For A Motive For The Secretive Stance Of The
Bush Administration Towards 9/11, or, "Inciting a Truth Movement"
I am not the only person who can figure out that if people are
secretive and uncooperative, it is probably because they’re hiding
something (and that the more secretive they are, the more they have to
hide). So why has the mainstream press reached the consensus that the
Bush Mob has hindered the 9/11 investigations because it wishes to
“avoid embarrassment,” rather than to
“avoid incrimination”? What
deeper motives might there be for their stonewalling investigations
into one of the biggest crimes in our history?
As far fetched as it may seem, this wouldn't be the first time in
history a country planned or executed a major attack on its own soil
and blamed foreign factions for political purposes. The Reichstag Fires
which occurred under Hitler’s regime in Germany and the Northwoods
Operation in the United States under the Kennedy administration during
the early sixties are two prime examples of such planning.
Unlike the rest of the world, most people in this country insist
that there is not a large enough, technologically advanced enough, or
rich enough power base in the U.S. that could have orchestrated the
events of 9/11. Yet they are perfectly content to believe that people
from a less technologically advanced and poorer country could have done
so. They are willing to believe that people who are operating out of
caves, far across the world from us, have more expertise than we do.
These superpowered demons, headed by bin Laden, apparently possess an
elusive power base so magical that we cannot locate it, despite all our
technology. However, we can still somehow receive updates and videos
regularly from them—but, oddly enough we cannot trace the sources of
these communications. Just like children fearing boogiemen beneath our
beds, we seem to assume these dark forces are far trickier and more
resourceful than the most powerful country in the world. Educated U.S.
citizens, unlike the educated and thinking citizens of other countries,
have suspended their common sense as if hypnotized by the shock and
denial they experienced in the wake of the vulnerability they felt
following 9/11. They have accepted the party line that it was evil
“others,” far across the world, who, by themselves, planned and
executed this amazing feat (and that it is just a coincidence that this
was the rationale for Bush’s attacks on two oil-rich countries). They
cannot see that there is no evil demon with such magical, unlimited
resources, but that it is our own denial-laced fears that have fueled
our false beliefs in the omniscient power of the hidden
Although we can see that our democracy has been taken over by
powerful and well-funded religious fanatics who continually terrorize
living beings across the globe, we fail to acknowledge that if they
have the technology, membership, and organization to foil elections and
stage phony wars (in the face of massive protest around the world),
they might likewise have the resources and drive to pull off such a
massive deception as the 9/11 disaster in their own country.
How long must we remain hypnotized by shock and paralyzed by fear
and depression before we realize that only our own whistle-blowing will
stop these people? It is well past time to examine in depth the truly
terrible agendas operating in our government and to expose how these
agendas are being covered up. We, apparently, are the only population
that doesn’t see through the charade. Every day we read of the degree
to which they are willing to go in order to deceive us. Even Colin
Powell called Rumsfeld and others “f---ing crazy” in their
masterminding of the Iraq war.
Pride is difficult to swallow. No one wants to be a fool. In this
paper, I hope to help people understand how it is that we could have
been so thoroughly fooled and how so many of us still remain staunchly
deluded. For once we understand a problem, we need no longer be subject
to its dynamic influences.
Regarding the historical details that prove that our country has
indeed been inclined to attack its own people for political ends, I
refer readers to historians like Howard Zinn. Herein, I offer insights
arising from my expertise in the psychologies of addiction, religious
cults, mind control, and hypnosis to explain how an entire country was
duped, and how to recover our perspectives.
Let’s begin on the level of personal psychology, of which political
psychology is a manifestation. George W. Bush is a power addict and a
puppet of the factions he represents. Like many power addicts, he has a
history of alcoholism (as well as cocaine abuse). He is what is called
a “dry alcoholic”—he may not drink, but he cannot
face reality either,
and therefore behaves with the same denial as one who does drink.
Alcoholics have a compulsive need to be in control of others, since
they are unable to control their own impulses and drives. They attempt
to assert control by falsely inflating themselves and their causes.
Everyone succumbs, on occasion, to denial when their pain becomes too
great, but addicts have a particularly flagrant disregard for the
truth. They cannot tolerate feelings of vulnerability and when their
recovery is not going well, they replace one addiction with another.
Having given up substance abuse, George Bush has adopted fanaticism
as a false means of control over his feelings of vulnerability. This is
a typical response of people seeking to escape the shame of their past
and their disorganized, chaotic experience. Constricting themselves
within the bounds of a rigid, fundamentalist, ideological framework
allows such people to shelter themselves from the potentially
overwhelming levels of anxiety that may be experience during the
process healthy recovery. It allows them to substitute authoritative
quick fixes for actually having to think (rather than drink). They fail
to develop common sense and reasoning powers to heal the
disorganization and panic they experience. They are driven by a
philosophy which compels them to react first and (try not to) think
Grandiosity is a hallmark addicts and alcoholics because the most
difficult thing for them to cope with is powerlessness. “
matter whether or not you believe in a higher power,” author John
Bradshaw tells people in recovery, “just that you know that you
it.” When in power, theses people deal with their feelings of
powerlessness by continually attempting to convince themselves and
anyone opposed to them that they are all right and others are all
wrong. Their sense of loss and defeat are so strong that they need to
believe, like children needing their parents’ divine approval, that
they have “God” on their side.
Polarized, black-and-white thinking is the hallmark of mental
illness. Bush and his carefully chosen, like-minded mob represent a
huge faction of similar-minded fanatics who project their rigid,
fear-based internal structures upon others within a black-and-white,
good-versus-evil framework of thinking. Bradshaw writes that alcoholics
don'’t have relationships, but instead “take hostages.”
We citizens are
expected to observe the unspoken but classic rules that protect the
alcoholic head of the family: “Don’t talk, don’t think,
Such “addictive scripts” help maintain the power and façade of
alcoholics and addicts. And the amazing part is that we, as citizens,
may unknowingly play our parts as enablers, just like children of
alcoholics. Sadly, many of us, acting as virtual children of
alcoholics, play our parts in maintaining what we hope to be some
measure of stability in our systems. As loyal children in an alcoholic
family, many people will rigidly deny the extent to which our
“parental” powers will go to manipulate and control us with fear.
The defenses we may employ in our denials arise in infancy and are only
finally uprooted through therapy or through insight that is willing to
upset the systems we internalized.
Denial is a primitive defense; children understandably don’t
acknowledge the alcoholic father’s insanity—after all he’s
father they’ve got. The Bush administration depends upon our continued
fear and isolation from like-minded others to keep us bonded to it in
ignorance of what it does. Inflated patriotism is but a misguided
defense of a system that has the will and means to destroy us for
power, just like an alcoholic parent will sacrifice all for drink. As
long as we feel overwhelmed and disempowered, we won’t investigate our
intuitions or connect the dots.
It certainly helps the agendas of those in power if we are
chronically too tired, broken and scared to think, feel, and talk.
Otherwise, we might find the energy to contemplate the truth, to have
insights and inspirations, and to organize. The George Bushes of our
country are absolutely terrified of the power of the masses.
We have learned to “negatively hallucinate,”
that is, to not see
the obvious, when it contradicts our beliefs. We have been raised and
bred in institutions and families where the very persons preparing and
conditioning us for the “real world” have hidden their
own skeletons in
our closets. Without our realizing it, their shames, secrets, and fears
become our inheritances. While it is all right to hate Bush and company
for being liars and idiots, we stop short of believing they could be
evil and powerful enough to have actually organized and pulled off the
We were hypnotized on 9/11. Some of the strategies used to bring
about a hypnotic state include shock, repetition of phrases and images,
and exploiting people’s sense of
vulnerability so that they relinquish their previously held
beliefs and endorse something formerly untenable to them. The Bush
administration has employed what hypnotists refer to as a “yes set” in
order to bring us under its spell:
The towers were hit. Yes.
People died. Yes. The world is unsafe.
Yes. We know who did it. Yes. We must react now. Yes. If you are not
with us you are against us. Huh? The towers were hit. People died. Yes.
And so on until all the answers are the desired “yes.”
After the shock and the deepening of our fear reactions through
repetitive imagery and continuous intimidation and lies, we found
ourselves in a state of disorganization and simulated ego
disintegration. Consequently, we have been thinking with our reptilian
brains rather than our frontal lobes, which means we that we haven’t
been THINKING at all. (The reptilian brain stem is only capable of
fight or flight responses, not reasoned ones).
Opening our minds to the revelations described on this website
forces us to confront our deepest, survival-based beliefs: it is almost
impossible for us to accept that something so extreme could happen
Can you imagine that when Hitler was coming into power, the general
public believed the rumors? Who would have taken seriously such
nightmarish images as concentration camps replete with huge ovens? Who
ever had heard of such a thing? The first people who were on to it
were, no doubt, dubbed “conspiracy nuts” by the public (They were,
interestingly, referred to by the Third Reich as “terrorists.”).
In time, the truth comes out. The world had to face the ugliest
truth, and when it did, it said, “Never again.”
But how closely now are
we watching over our freedom? Are we unknowingly protecting ourselves
from highly upsetting truths in order to protect our unconscious,
infantile, need to believe that this is a democracy and a country
devoted to our well-being
Our tendencies toward denial are also enhanced by the messages from
the commercial world that constantly bombard us: “Don’t
“Take a pill.” “Soft, easy, quick.”
We have been raised as a country of
addicts brainwashed into finding a way out of feeling pain. The longer
we delude ourselves and try to avoid our pain, the greater is the
infection we that we create within our collective psyche.
The movie “The Truman Show” features a character
who has been set
up all his life to believe in a fake reality in which he was being
tricked and used. He finally rejects this reality, choosing to enter
the unknown and face possible death over living a lie. Why have we been
afraid to imagine the worst when there is ample reason for suspicion?
Are we afraid of the anxiety such a disruption could evoke in our
minds? This is what the protagonist of “The Truman Show”
had to face.
Like him, we need to become willing to give up our sense of false
security in order to stop living a huge lie. Otherwise, we will remain,
like children of alcoholics, afraid of our feelings of powerlessness.
Of course it is difficult to confront our fears and insecurities.
But the good news is that facing reality is the way to become
empowered. Do we fear that if we discovered the worst, we might explode
with anger? Or implode with despair? Who ever imagined that we’d have
to worry about rigged elections? Heck, that’s one of the criteria for
fascism, and we hold the true ideals of democracy close to us. The
psychological weakness in our collective consciousness that has allowed
George Bush to abuse his power needs to be deeply examined, in order
for these dynamics to change.
The clarity and thoroughness of the evidence laid out on this
website allows us to take the first steps toward being able to believe
that the Bush administration was behind the 9/11 attacks. Change
happens incrementally. Little waves of inspiration and insight feed
bigger waves. The inevitable backlash against the lies of the last
three years might even lead to a truth movement. We needn't be
despondent; rather, we need to get even by creating this truth
movement. The evidence supporting the claims of Bush’s complicity in
9/11 is available is readily available both on the internet and
increasingly in hardcopy. This information is as plain as math, as
concrete and physical as anything you’ve ever learned in school.
It becomes easier to face upsetting, painful facts once we become
willing to change our beliefs. George Bush’s lies have paved the way
for a new wave of believers. Thanks to the Bush mob’s relentless lies,
we are being prodded to loosen the tightest of our psychological
constrictions, our beliefs in what is possible.
Beliefs are the hardest off all psychological mechanisms to change.
They are the structures upon which we have built our lives. To
challenge our belief system is to threaten our ideas of who we are.
Doing so can be disastrously disorienting, which is why people have
been so slow to catch on—but it can also be enormously relieving and
When a problem seems too huge to fix, you can’t begin to change it
until you change your beliefs. You need to throw out your old lenses in
order to be able to perceive what you formerly couldn’t see. Then you
can begin to emerge from your reptilian, survival-oriented, limited
brain and begin to imagine and put together the many available puzzle
Einstein said that imagination is more important than knowledge. We
need imagination now to counter the mindsets we inherited as a result
of being raised in systems that were designed to protect power. We
learned to believe that those with power over us were truly protecting
us, despite their nasty habits and lies. We were trained not to see who
our real enemies are.
But we can stop being controlled by fear now. We can utilize our
healthy outrage to expose the inconsistencies in what we have been told
and leave no stone unturned. Our country’s situation is not hopeless
for the simple reason that we are not children and we can expose the
traitors who have used political power against the people they are
supposed to serve.
The Bush administration is not above the law. The more this
administration disrespects the citizens of this country, the more
pressure it creates in people to break free of it at last and consider
the extent of its insanity.
To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The Bush
administration’s continual lies are bound to generate more and more
skepticism toward them and an increasing interest in the truth. We are
consequently being led into a sort of “forced individuation.”
As our truth movement gains momentum to break free of the excuses
and lies, we will see who the true “terrorists”
within our own
government are. We will know that the so-called “war on terrorism”
is a fantasy.
When we break the code of silence, we will have to walk away from
the government that we have allowed to morph into an instrument of
corporate control. We will then either turn back to our original
Constitution or go forth and find a new vision, moving, with a keen eye
for truth, into uncharted territories. It will be very exciting. But we
will no longer be innocent children, for we will have become aware of
what can happen if we don’t carefully guard democracy, especially in
this new millennium. As adults, we will have to begin by envisioning
alternatives. We must begin by brainstorming a new system. No more can
we allow such massive failures of our own imagination. No more
“intelligence failures.” It is healthy to get mad, but use that fuel
wisely: Get creative and spread the truth. We can’t heal what we can’t
feel. We can’t change what we won’t even dare to imagine.
Here is an excerpt from a November 7, 2001 piece that appeared on
ABC.com about a book by David Ruppe:
Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S.
Cities to Provoke War With Cuba
NEW YORK, May 1: In the early 1960s, America’s
top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill
innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S.
cities to create public support for a war against
Cuba. Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly
included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of
Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S.
ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The
plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the
international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba’s then new
leader, communist Fidel Castro. America’s top military brass even
contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: “We could blow
up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba,” and, “casualty lists
in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”
The following excerpt is from an article that appeared on September
13, 2002 in CommonDreams.org, by historian Harvey Wasserman, entitled
“Bush’s 9/11 Reichstag Fire”:
“When Hitler was rising to power in 1930s Germany, somebody
did him the favor of burning the Reichstag, the German Parliament. It’s
widely believed the Nazis torched it themselves. Hitler’s cynical
minions turned that fire into a horrific wave of terror. They blamed
“the communists” and the Jews, the trade unionists and the homosexuals.
With the support of a terrified populace, they suspended civil
rights and civil liberties, fattened their war machine and rode the
fascist tide into a full-blown dictatorship. The rest, as they say, is