Fri, June 1, 2007
9/11 gov't complicity
Re: 9/11: an 'inside job?'
you for covering the vital fact that architects such as Richard Gage
and other qualified professionals are blowing the whistle on the U.S.
government's conspiracy theory of 9/11. It is crucial that the rotten
foundation of the War of Terror be exposed -- and its war-criminal
perpetrators arrested and tried for treason -- before the next
false-flag attack on U.S. citizens, or an attack on Iran. The Democrats
in Congress obviously have no intention of rocking the globalist boat
with any impeachment for illegal acts that are not even in dispute,
much less are they going to help expose 9/11 truth. Responsible
citizens must continue to raise public awareness and keep the pressure
on until a serious investigation free of conflicts of interest is
While I applaud your decision to cover the
story, your belittling introduction ("Conspiracy buffs are in for a big
treat") is unprofessional. Gage and other 9/11 skeptics know what they
are talking about. It is no treat for us to have to acknowledge that
government officials charged with protecting us actually killed 3,000
of us on 9/11. For many, even considering this possibility is akin to
considering that your spouse or parent is a sexual abuser. This is part
of the reason that the corporate and left media ignored the massive
evidence of official complicity as long as possible, then treated
skeptics with ridicule rather than considering the facts
dispassionately. In future articles, please find the courage and
strength to face the truth rationally and avoid emotional appeals
designed to squelch thought.
If we really wanted to "squelch thought," we wouldn't be running your letter.
Re: 9/11: an 'inside job?'
My sincerest congratulations for having the strength of conviction to publish this article on 9/11.
the past year I have been aware that 9/11 was an inside job but have
seen very little mention of it in the mainstream media. This has caused
me to view the mainstream media as largely irrelevant to any effort to
understand global political events.
Your article has given me hope that at
least some organs of the media are prepared to come forward and present
the glaringly obvious truth of 9/11.
The editors of your paper all deserve commendations for running that story. Certainly you have my unreserved admiration.
(You make us blush.)
What do you believe?
Re: Deconstructing the myth, Letters, May 29.
was with great amusement that I read a letter writer's version of
events pertaining to 9/11. The two towers which collapsed first did not
collapse on top on Building 7. The towers collapsed straight down,
while Building 7 stood approximately 350 feet away (about the length of
a football field).
The only attempt by the main stream media to "debunk" the 9/11 truth movement has indeed been Popular Mechanics.
attempts at debunking the truth movement have been weak at best. I
suggest researching the works of Dr. David Ray Griffin whose research
on 9/11 puts the "efforts" of PM to shame.
Are we really to believe that 19 Saudi
hijackers with box-cutters controlled by a man in cave overtook four
commercial airliners almost simultaneously and hit 75% of their
intended targets? We need to ask the question "Who stood to gain?"
The U.S. government imposed the Patriot
Act, started a war with a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, and
have their sights set on Iran. All in the name of 9/11.
God help us all.
(The truth is out there.)
Previous letter: Letters: May 31
Click to subscribe