< ^ >
9 - 1 1 R e s e a r c h
.com
.wtc7.net
Home
Analysis
New York City
collapsing buildings
other high-rise fires
other collapses
WTC 1, 2 collapses
design parameters
role of fires
fire severity
effects on steel
collapse features
explosive events
demolition squibs
frame shattering
concrete pulverization
dust volume
steel shredding
symmetry
mushrooming
speed of fall
demolition proofs
speed of fall
volume of dust
breakup of top
collapse theories
column failure theory
truss theory
demolition theories
basement bombs
nuclear devices
directed energy
radiant projectiles
distributed explosives
thermobarics
thermite
simulations
Building 7 collapse
rate of fall
controlled demolition
WTC 6, 5 holes
Pentagon
assault location
Pentagon videos
witnesses
forensics
impact damage
damage pattern
aircraft debris
shockwave
jetliner approach
theories
Eastman
Bart
attack from the air
NORAD stand-down
flight mysteries
phone calls
theories
suicide pilots
home run system
flight program
bumble planes
Flight 93 shoot-down
Won-Young Kim
follow-up attacks
anthrax
perpetrators
intent
minimized fatalities
maximized shock
conspiracy
Attack Scenario 404
whistleblowers
official actions
evidence destruction
investigation prevention
9-11 anomalies
top anomalies
historical precedents
Search
Essays
Reviews
Talks
Interviews
FAQs
Materials
Papers
Resources
Site Guide
About
Contact
Contribute
V 1.41
Copyright 2003-2013,
911Research.WTC7.net site last updated:3/21/13
fair use notice

Background Attack Aftermath Evidence Misinformation Analysis Memorial

Attack From the Air

Caught Off-Guard by Islamic Terrorists or Exploited by a Horrific Fraud

The story that the air attacks of New York City and the Pentagon were achieved by Islamic terrorists exploiting vulnerabilities in airline security seemed plausible enough to most Americans, most of whom could be counted on to accept the story being told by the media without critical examination of the details. That story, which was virtually indistinguishable from the version of events endorsed by the government, was rejected by skeptics for reasons falling into two broad topics:

Most Americans, and indeed most observers throughout the world, failed to notice problems with the official story for a number of reasons. We examine some of those reasons relating to each of the above topics.

Hijacking Scenario

Many of the problems with the hijacking scenario could be pieced together from press accounts in the days and weeks following the attack. Paul Thompson's 9/11 timelines basically refute the official story using reports from mainstream media. However, the rapidity with which the official story emerged, and the "bandwidth" given it, assured that it would be solidified in the public mind to the point that the damning details emerging in the following weeks would not threaten its acceptance.

Failure of the Military to Intercept

Public doubt of the official story was not engendered by the lack of U.S. military response to the crisis for a number of reasons, including common misconceptions that were exploited and reinforced by government officials.

  • The air defense system only protects only against offshore threats.
    Most people are unaware that all domestic airspace is continuously monitored, and that the FAA is required to report off-course aircraft to NORAD for prompt military intercept.
  • The government had not contemplated airliners being used as missiles.
    This lie was explicitly made by Condoleezza Rice. In fact, the military had practiced war games based on the scenario of hijacked airliners being flown into buildings. 1  
  • Interception means shoot-down.
    This misconception was cleverly exploited by Dick Cheney.
2  
References

1. Report Warned Of Suicide Hijackings, CBSNEWS.com, 3/17/02 [cached]
2. Nine hundred and Eleven Missing Pieces, [cached]

page last modified: 2011-04-11