The 9/11/01 attack was and is a psychological operation: It was designed to deceive people by exploiting their subconscious conditioning and desires, such as the extreme reluctance to consider seriously the possibility that the "leaders of the free world" are in fact the perpetrators of 9/11/01 and similar false-flag terror operations. The true identities of the perpetrators of the attack are further hidden by disinformation campaigns which reinforce the idea that only foolish conspiracy theorists question the official story. The most effective such campaigns are waged mostly by unwitting participants, victims of cleverly marketed misinformation.
Sites Exposing Misinformation
|site and description||format||focus|
||collection of illustrated articles|
||marked-up copy of reviewed site|
|Debunking the Debunkers
Pages Exposing Misinformation
|URL and description||format|
This page summarizes a series of 2007 interviews by Michael Woolsey with various researchers on the subject of COINTELPRO and disinformation, including Jim Hoffman, John Albanese, and William Pepper.
The WTC Impacts: 767s or 'Whatzits'?
This article deconstructs the idea, promoted by Webfairy, Scott Longhrey, and Gerard Holmgren, that one or both of the Twin Tower collisions were faked and did not involve actual 767s.
The 'no planers' respond
This second article in the series by Eric Salter examines responses by Webfairy and Scott Longhrey to the first article.
Disinformation masquerading as 9/11 Truth exposure
This essay summarizes the disinformation memes used to pollute the discourse about the attack. Much of the content of this once lengthy page has been split off into other pages, such as the hoaxes page, leaving this page to focus on the history of the 'no-planes' theories.
In Plane Site: a bad joke 'hidden in plain sight'
This essay provides a devastating critique of the video In Plane Site.
The Pentagon attack: the 'no plane' theories discredit 9/11 skepticism and distract from proven evidence of complicity
This in-depth essay provides a thorough rundown on the Pentagon 'no-plane' theories and how they've been used as a distraction.
Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception
This page examines the way in which misinformation is used to discredit challenges to the official account of 0/11/01. It is the introductory page to the large information warfare section of 911Review.com, which flags numerous errors in the literature of '9/11 skeptics.'
Rick Siegel's 9/11 Eyewitness: Sensationalism and Pseudo-Science
This review of the video 9/11 Eyesitness describes the DVD, which combines footage of videographer Rick Siegel talking, Siegel's footage of the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 with overlays, and illustrated narration packaged as science lessons. As the review shows, the DVD's most prominent claims are anything but scientific.
The running commentary of the creator of Flight77.info, a website created to document the legal process to obtain government-held video recordings related to Flight 77, has many interesting reflections on the psychology behind the no-Boeing theories.
The Kennebunkport Warning: Hoax?
This article exposes an apparent hoax circulated weeks before the sixth anniversary of the attack, perhaps with the intent of driving a wedge between peace activists and 9/11 truth activists.
back to Web Resources