What Does CIT Purport to Prove?

* Explicit Premise: (1) "North-side flyover"

• Jetliner approaches from north of Citgo station instead of south side

* Implicit Premises: (2) No Crash; (3) Pentagon flyover

• Crash damage path is inconsistent with the north-of-Citgo approach
• Therefore: plane didn't crash as believed by witnesses
• Therefore:
  • Plane must have flown over, not into, Pentagon
  • Pentagon crash evidence was faked

(CIT takes advantage of well-established belief by many skeptics of the official story that a jetliner couldn't have crashed into the Pentagon)