Thanks to the Researchers of the Pentagon Attack
This presentation is almost entirely a synthesis of
facts and analysis compiled by other researchers.
Many people made this work possible,
from the people who took the photographs shown here,
to those who created the photo-montages
showing the extent of the damage to the Pentagon.
Some of the researchers deserving credit are:
Comments by 9-11 Research added on 7/3/05
911Research re-evaluated the evidence of the Pentagon crash
in much greater detail in mid-2004,
arriving at the conclusion that the heavily promoted theory that
something very different from a Boeing 757 crashed at the Pentagon
is likely an elaborate hoax.
A key proponent of this view is the creator of OilEmpire.us, whose
provides a wealth of evidence that the no-Boeing theory is a hoax.
Several of the sources cited above have helped to propagate
gross errors in describing evidence of the attack.
was most successful vector of the Pentagon no-Boeing theory
which were effectively marketed and translated into dozens of languages.
Meyssan's work contains gross errors in evaluating evidence,
such as using a photograph of the facade in which
fire foam spray obscures the first floor
to conclude that the impact hole was 18 feet wide.
is the source of the graphic reproduced on the previous page,
which deceptively implies a jetliner is a solid stainless steel object
that should produce a hole matching the full extent of its profile.
This idea is debunked
The voila site also presents the two eyewitness accounts that
describe the aircraft as a commuter jet,
while ignoring the numerous accounts that it was a large jetliner.
Several pages of the site use the
five frames of video
leaked by the Pentagon to amplify the idea
that the attack involved a small plane,
while failing to note any of the frames' features that indicate forgery.