As part of its mission to uncover the truth
behind 9/11/01 --
an event that is easily the most sophisticated
psy-op in history --
9-11Research has focused on aspects of the attack
in which physical evidence contradicts the official account.
Evidence of the Pentagon attack is frequently cited
as disproving the official story.
This talk was first presented by on October 17th, 2003,
at CellSpace in San Francisco, California.
It was co-authored by Jim Hoffman
and an individual who wishes to remain anonymous.
The conclusion of this talk,
Whatever Struck the Pentagon Was Not a Boeing 757,
implies that no 757 was involved in the attack.
9-11Research does not endorse this implication.
To the contrary, 9-11Research finds that the 'no-jetliner' claims
are a hoax that has been instrumental in discrediting the
'9/11 Truth Movement'.
See the talk
The Pentagon Attack: The No-Jetliner Claims.
We find that, whereas the evidence that the Twin Towers
and Building 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition is overwhelming --
a case layed out in
The World Trade Center Demolition --
the evidence regarding exactly what occurred in the Pentagon
attack is ambiguous and difficult to draw clear conclusions from.
We do, however, find the official story of the Pentagon attack
untenable for a number of reasons:
The fact that the portion of the Pentagon attacked was
due to ongoing renovations, and that
the aircraft undertook an extreme maneuver to strike this portion
are strong evidence that the attack was an inside job.
The complexity and precision of the approach maneuver are nearly
impossible to reconcile with the official account that the plane
was piloted by Hani Hanjour, an incompetent pilot of even
suggest that the jetliner exploded before impacting the building.
of evidence of the attack,
indications of forgery
in the five video frames released by the Pentagon
suggest insiders have conspired to conceal the nature of the attack.