< ^ >
9 - 1 1 R e s e a r c h
.com
.wtc7.net
Home
Analysis
New York City
collapsing buildings
other high-rise fires
other collapses
WTC 1, 2 collapses
design parameters
role of fires
fire severity
effects on steel
collapse features
explosive events
demolition squibs
frame shattering
concrete pulverization
dust volume
steel shredding
symmetry
mushrooming
speed of fall
demolition proofs
speed of fall
volume of dust
breakup of top
collapse theories
column failure theory
truss theory
demolition theories
basement bombs
nuclear devices
directed energy
radiant projectiles
distributed explosives
thermobarics
thermite
simulations
Building 7 collapse
rate of fall
controlled demolition
WTC 6, 5 holes
Pentagon
assault location
Pentagon videos
witnesses
forensics
impact damage
damage pattern
aircraft debris
shockwave
jetliner approach
theories
Eastman
Bart
attack from the air
NORAD stand-down
flight mysteries
phone calls
theories
suicide pilots
home run system
flight program
bumble planes
Flight 93 shoot-down
Won-Young Kim
follow-up attacks
anthrax
perpetrators
intent
minimized fatalities
maximized shock
conspiracy
Attack Scenario 404
whistleblowers
official actions
evidence destruction
investigation prevention
9-11 anomalies
top anomalies
historical precedents
Search
Essays
Reviews
Talks
Interviews
FAQs
Materials
Papers
Resources
Site Guide
About
Contact
Contribute
V 1.41
Copyright 2003-2013,
911Research.WTC7.net site last updated:3/21/13
fair use notice

Background Attack Aftermath Evidence Misinformation Analysis Memorial

Collapse Theories

Theories Gravity Caused the Twin Towers to Crush Themselves

The official story of the collapse of the Twin Towers is that gravity caused them to crush themselves. The impacts and fires weakened the buildings near the the crash zones but it was gravity that did the work of demolishing them. There are principally two official theories:

Both theories are frequently called pancake theories because the pancake metaphor subtly suggests the buildings consisted primarily of heavy floor slabs, not vertical pillars of steel. Variants of the column failure theory were the first out of the block. They ask us to believe that all of the columns on one level suddenly failed, causing the overhanging portion of the tower to fall at least a floor, thereby acquiring enough momentum to crush the intact portion of the tower, floor-by-floor.

The column failure theory would suffice for scientific papers and insurance claims, but the American public would require something less obviously inconsistent with the reality that the columns of entire floors were not glowing red-hot. Hence the truss failure theory was presented on popular science shows, and endorsed by FEMA's official report. It asks us to believe that the fires weakened floor trusses, causing a whole floor diaphragm to fall, initiating a chain reaction of floor failures. That is supposed to lead to the collapse of the perimeter walls and core structures, an idea made more palatable by hiding the towers' core structures, or misrepresenting them as mechanically unsubstantial.

LINK

Progressive Collapse

The experts gave us the cool-sounding progressive collapse to help sell the collapse theories, whether they emphasize falling floors or buckling columns. But does it apply to steel structures? Some structures do fall apart under their own weight if sufficiently weakened or disturbed, such as burned wood-frame houses, or earthquake-fractured masonry buildings. Steel structures are not known to, outside of rare cases, but perhaps they could be designed to. Getting a steel structure to crumble from the top down -- as in the alleged progressive collapse phenomenon -- is an even greater challenge.

Not only is top-down progressive collapse completely unknown in other steel structures, we know of no documented case of it using any materials. Hence we have created the progressive collapse challenge. We believe the first two challenges are possible. Some variant of the following construction may work.

Construct a tower by balancing thin cylinders upright in rows around the perimeter of a square plate. Balance a second plate on the tops of the cylinders, and arrange similar rows of cylinders on it. Repeat this arrangement of alternating plates and cylinders for the height of the tower.

If such a structure were disturbed near the top, it could come tumbling down, and the collapse just might start at the zone of the disturbance and progress downward.

LINK

Other Theories

In addition to the officially endorsed column failure and truss failure theories, other theories have been volunteered to explain the explosive disintegration of the towers, while also ignoring or denying demolition. Some of these are identified in a taxonomy of collapse theories.


page last modified: 2011-09-08