9 - 1 1 R e s e a r c h
.com
.wtc7.net
Home
Evidence
World Trade Center
destroyed evidence
aircraft
structural steel
missing evidence
bodies
building contents
gold
asbestos
surviving evidence
photographs
jet impacts
fires
destruction
dust clouds
Building 7
WTC 3, 4, 5, 6
Ground Zero
surroundings
construction
videos
timelines
seismic records
persisting heat
molten iron
forensic metallurgy
orange spout
dust analysis
thermitic residues
active thermitics
gas emissions
eyewitness accounts
oral histories
firefighter audiotape
demolition admission
tower blueprints
structural
electrical
Pentagon
missing evidence
Pentagon footage
surviving evidence
photographs
CCTV video
eyewitness accounts
Eric Bart compilation
anonymous compilation
large jetliner
moment of impact
explosives
other aircraft
approach details
flights
destroyed evidence
missing evidence
airport video
phone calls
call detail
cell phone calls
black boxes
flight data
voice data
air controllers
bodies
surviving evidence
passenger lists
photographs
eyewitness accounts
Flight 93 transcript
NTSB Reports
Search
Essays
Reviews
Talks
Interviews
FAQs
Materials
Papers
Resources
Site Guide
About
Contact
Contribute
V 1.43
Copyright 2003-2015,
911Research.WTC7.net site last updated:09/09/2015
fair use notice

Background Attack Aftermath Evidence Misinformation Analysis Memorial

Tower Blueprints

Missing Evidence of the World Trade Center Attack

NOTE: This page is archived as a historical record. The current page is here.

The blueprints to the Twin Towers and Building 7 remain off-limits to the public three years after the attack, despite the fact that the buildings were built with public money and that the engineering drawings of public buildings are supposed to be public information. 1   Incredibly, FEMA's team that investigated the collapses lacked access to the buildings' blueprints -- access which has been the subject of legal battles.

LINK

FEMA Misrepresented the Towers' Construction

Chapter 2 of FEMA's report, "WTC 1 and WTC 2", appears to be carefully crafted to support the "truss theory" or "pancake theory". The comments added to the chapter expose many deceptive techniques employed in the article. 2   Those techniques are nicely summarized by a comparison of the following two structural framing plans of a typical floor of the Twin Towers. The first is taken from the book Multi-Storey Buildings in Steel 3   The second is from FEMA's report.

It is clear that the FEMA plan is misleading because of the far too small dimensions of the core column cross-sections. If the first drawing can be believed -- and unfortunately it cannot be verified because accurate building drawings have not been made public -- then one can surmise that the FEMA plan has the following misleading characteristics:

  • The core columns (red boxes in the turquoise region) are neither shown to scale nor in their correct positions. They are drawn far smaller than their actual dimensions.
  • It fails to show the structures connecting the core columns to each other, implying the core is entirely dependent on the floor diaphragms for bracing.
  • All trusses are shown with a spacing of one truss for every other perimeter wall column, instead of a truss for every column, with alternate spacing used only for the cross-trusses.
What do all of these misrepresentations have in common?

LINK

World Trade Center Master Plan

While detailed engineering drawings of the World Trade Center remain unavailable, 9-11 Research has been able to obtain drawings of the MASTER PLAN, dated December 16, 1963.


References

1. WTC surveillance tapes feared missing, AP, 12/10/02 [cached]
2. WTC 1 and WTC 2, FEMA.gov,
3. Multi-Storey Buildings in Steel, Second Edition, 1978

page last modified: 2013-03-21